Morals ———–Ethics —————-Law
Is the behaviour described in the examples below related to ethics:
If it is, why and how?
Can you come up with a solution that would solve the ethical problem?
- You find some good images on the web that would look good on your site. You copy and paste them to your blog.
- In general using someone else’s work without crediting the creator is unethical
- The answer to this depends on the images and their source and whether the blog is earning money.
- Many images are available under a Creative Commons license allowing free fair use
- Copyright images can be used if permission is obtained from the owner
- Using a copyright images is usually illegal
- There are many websites currently offering free content such as unsplash.com
- There are morality issues as to the massive amount of money made by some businesses selling content on the web.
2. You are in a hurry to finish an assignment and you find the perfect explanation of a difficult concept on Wikipedia. You decide to copy it into your work.
- Strictly speaking copying directly from a source, while not unethical is academically frowned upon, it is better to paraphrase to show understanding of the concepts.
- APA referencing require the use of quotation marks and in text referencing directly copied material.
- At the bottom of each page Wikipedia has the following statement “This page is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License”
- This means that material on Wikipedia is free and can be copied, shared and adapted
- Provided you give appropriate credit, distribute the content using the same licence and do not restrict access to your content.
3. You are a medical researcher and you think you have discovered a new drug that cures lung cancer. It worked well on mice although a few of them died of heart problems. You want to test it on people. You recruit 100 lung cancer patients into your treatment programme. You don’t tell them about the new drug. You treat 50 patients with usual drugs and 50 with the new drug to see which is better.
- This is definitely unethical, there is no indication of consent in the process
- Additionally, it is not ethical to test without telling the patient they may be taking an experimental drug.
- Additionally, there is no evidence that they were informed of Death as a potential side-effect.
- Today most new drugs are introduced in phases, starting with phase 0 trials on a small set of people to assess the effect of the drug on a body.
- The trials progress through to phase 4 which is after FDA approval and involves thousands of patients
- https://www.nccn.org/patients/resources/clinical_trials/phases.aspx is a good overview.
- This issue can be solved by following standard phases required by regulatory authorities
- There will also be thorough Informed Consent involved at each stage of the process
- Potential side-effects are part of the Informed Consent documentation
4. You are doing your PhD about drug abuse among students. You interview 30 students about their drug use. You discover that one of the students is actually a fairly big time dealer and you report him to the police.
- The ethics of reporting a study subject to authorities is a tricky issue
- Legally both the users and dealers of drugs are engaging in a criminal act
- What makes the Dealer any different from a user? It boils down to harm
- Potentially the Dealer is subjecting the user to potential serious consequences.
- If the consequences were minimal then I think Privacy and Confidentiality issues should prevent informing the authorities
- A better designed study would solve this
- The students would be anonymised, maybe with a written survey with no personal information
- Additionally the study should specify boundaries, what will constitute behaviour that will be reported, again informed consent would help here
- The students then understand the risks of participation
5. You are a researcher looking at the effect of violent computer games on children. You recruit 20 children into your study. Over a month you regularly show them images of violence to see if it has an adverse effect on their behaviour. One of the children becomes quite distressed each time and so you stop showing her images and drop her from the study.
- Ethically this study would never happen
- No researcher wold be allowed to expose children to potential harmful content
- No ethics committee would allow expose to violence in any form
- This problem is solved by doing a retrograde study
- Study groups of children and identify behaviors in those that have been exposed to violence in the past and compare the groups
- The principal of any research should be “first do no harm”
6. You want to research how easy it is to hack into your organisation’s computer system by persuading people to divulge login and password details. You recruit a small team to ring up key people in the organisation and persuade them to give either their own or their boss’s details.
- This research is not ethical as the subjects do not know they are being studied
- There are also legal considerations of Hacking a company’s system
- Penetration testing of a system is allowed if the company has recruited you to do the testing
- This situation can be avoided by informing staff that an exercise will be taking place in the future, this will affect the results in some way but surprisingly in this situation a significant proportion will still divulge the confidential information
7. You are doing an initial research in area of a town where may bars and pubs are located, to estimate the level of problematic social behaviour in the area. your research is independent from the police, because you want to observe their behaviour as well. You observe both abusive and violent behaviour.
- Again, the ethics are complicated here
- People are being studied with no informed consent of the testing, even though it’s just observation
- But informing then will invalidate the study by changing their behaviour
- Police are not well known for a positive reaction to being observed
- Abusive and violent behaviour has a high potential for harm
- To solve this issue would require defining boundaries in the study as to which types of behaviour would be “acceptable” for the study and what behaviours would require informing a relevant authority